Search for: "State v. Lucky" Results 541 - 560 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 5:40 am by David DePaolo
Ohio's 2nd District Court of Appeal had found the accident to be compensable, relying on the dual-purpose doctrine in reaching that conclusion.The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the 2nd DCA, saying there was no causal relationship between the worker's job and the accident.Last year, the 5th District Court of Appeals ruled in Friebel v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am by Russ Bensing
Some of the defendants got lucky. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:49 pm by Bill Marler
(Goulet V, King LA, Vaillant V, de Valk H. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:06 am
  For whatever reason, the husband in this case was not so lucky. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]