Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 541 - 560 of 3,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 9:19 am by Eric Goldman
X Do Mandatory Age Verification Laws Conflict with Biometric Privacy Laws? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by dcassuto
 In this case, it is but one of several standing claims and the court may not even reach it (the other claims are pretty bulletproof). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
It stuns me that there's not a state law version of abstention designed to solve problems like this one.There's a state statute that says that a city has to do X. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am by Chris Castle
  Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]