Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 541 - 560
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
"Court takes up case on eyewitness identification," is Mark Sherman's initial AP report on oral arguments in the case of Perry v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
United States – with which all other justices in Freeman expressly disagreed – on the theory that it is the “narrowest grounds” of a plurality opinion under Marks v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
Americans For Fair Patent Use, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
The high court’s decision in Barron v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:43 pm
To discuss the case, we have Mark H. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
See eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
"A call for separation of school and state": Today in The Boston Globe, columnist Jeff Jacoby has an op-ed that begins, "Whatever else might be said about it, US District Judge Mark Wolf's decision in Parker v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:42 pm
The outcome of the case was that LKQ (represented by Mark Lemley; MARK A. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
With reference to JLR v Ineos Holdings (see IPKat analysis here), it was noted that an initial recognition figure of 32.5% was statistically significant. [read post]
Illinois Courts Grapple With Pleading Standard for Intent to Deceive Element of False Marking Claims
3 Sep 2010, 6:37 am
Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
Is Article 5(1) and (3) of Directive 2008/95 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks to be interpreted in such a way that it must be viewed as constituting “[use] in the course of trade” of a trade mark in a Member State if an undertaking enters into an agreement via a website in a third country for the sale and dispatch of goods bearing the trade mark to a private purchaser with an address known to the vendor… [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 8:33 am
ALTMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE" Hats off to Mark Prada ! [read post]
