Search for: "State v. Null"
Results 541 - 560
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am
” The reference to “any” criminal law presumably covers both state and federal criminal law, unlike Section 230’s express exclusion only for federal criminal law (and the newly added state crime exclusions in FOSTA). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
Demarest (pictured) in Pisane v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:21 am
The stated definition includes marriages celebrated abroad under foreign law. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Carl v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
”Now, as far as scientific and medical understandings are concerned—and, more to the point, as far as understandings under federal law are concerned—this is a null set, because none of the covered 18 forms of FDA-approved birth control involves abortion. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am
It also defines public patrimony; defines the cases in which the acts practiced by the entities described in article 1 are null or voidable; defines the jurisdiction of the courts to hear such cases; states against whom such actions can be proposed; and provides the applicable legal procedure. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 12:46 am
Before siding with Nacchio’s argument, the 10th Circuit’s decision explained how Nottingham adopted the majority decision in Mooney, (United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
It provides a filter by which laws can be evaluated, and when laws turn out to fail Section 4’s test, the President can treat those laws as null and void, thus proceeding to follow his duties as Congress has otherwise instructed. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:26 am
(overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
A mention in this regard may also be made of the developments in the United States and United Kingdom where this right has had [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
First, he mentions the US Supreme Court’s “with all deliberate speed” language from what has become known as Brown II, the Court’s follow-up to its groundbreaking Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
The second significant case reflecting the sudden shift in the balance of power is Convertino v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:22 am
Let us imagine that, during a state of alarm, declared with force of law by the Constitutional Court, sanctioning administrative acts or prohibitions or other acts of encumbrance are issued. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
The judgment was later confirmed by the Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal’s ruling No. 31/2024 of 29 January 2024 but subsequently overturned by the aforementioned ADSC’s decision reported here.[5] It is worth recalling that, in this particular case, the ADSC clearly stated that the Civil Marriage Law does not apply to foreign Muslims irrespective of their origins. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
Role The United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) has designated BP Exploration & Production, Inc. [read post]
