Search for: "State v. Pointer" Results 541 - 560 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am by Marty Schwimmer
The term Internet site means the collection of digital assets, including links, indexes, or pointers to digital assets, accessible through the Internet that are addressed relative to a common domain name. (7) INTERNET SITE DEDICATED TO INFRINGING ACTIVITY. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is especially the case in view of the board’s obligations under Article 21 RPBA (OJ EPO 2007, 536). [4.3.2] G 1/03 [2.1] is of particular relevance in relation to state of the art under A 54(3). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
The rest of the PD sets out some useful pointers for what factors the court might consider in thinking about whether there is ‘good reason’ to do something different, and it gives some illustrative examples of what that something else might be (for example exclusion of the media for some or all of a hearing). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 The likelihood of state statutory or regulatory restrictions on insured arrangements is particularly likely because of the heavy regulation of these products by states including the widespread incorporation of ACA mandates into state insurance laws and regulations in response to the Market Reform provisions of the ACA. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
., Federal, State or local minimum wage), free and clear at least twice monthly during the entire certified period of employment. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Board also set forth (point 5.4) that, on the basis of the minutes of the oral proceedings in examination, it was at least implicit during the oral proceedings, and should have been known to the applicant, that both D1 and D2 were considered as "closest prior art".V. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
  As the Australian Electronic Commerce Expert Group stated in its 1998 Report to the Attorney-General[2]:“There is always the temptation, in dealing with the law as it relates to unfamiliar and new technologies to set the standards required of a new technology higher than those which currently apply to paper and to overlook the weaknesses that we know to inhere in the familiar. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
  As the Australian Electronic Commerce Expert Group stated in its 1998 Report to the Attorney-General[2]:“There is always the temptation, in dealing with the law as it relates to unfamiliar and new technologies to set the standards required of a new technology higher than those which currently apply to paper and to overlook the weaknesses that we know to inhere in the familiar. [read post]