Search for: "State v. State Racing Commission"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
Chapter V of the GDPR prohibits the transfer of personal data between the EEA and a third country unless the transfer falls under an enumerated legal mechanism. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:41 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:04 am
Earlier in March, the Federal Court for the District of Columbia decided National Women’s Law Center v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
Federal Election Commission and in Schuette v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bethune-Hill, an appeal by Republican legislators of a lower-court ruling that requires 11 state legislative districts to be redrawn to correct racial gerrymandering, and Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:35 am
§11133(a)(7)(B)(v). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
A court ruled that “stop-and-frisk” violated the Fourth Amendment in Floyd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:31 pm
Then in 1952 the NAACP brought five cases to the Supreme Court challenging segregation and seeking to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:43 am
Ltd & Ors v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
The paper describes threshold rescissions, which limit participation based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, restrict the ability to work legally and remain in the United States or adversely affect representation in the political system. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Hoda Muthana, from the United States, and Shamima Begum, from the United Kingdom, both married Islamic State fighters and had children in Syria. [read post]
