Search for: "State v. Vest"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:31 pm
In Marx v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:35 pm
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
§ 7.4000, which interpreted Section 484(a) to preempt state enforcement of state laws against national banks.The Court held that the reg was invalid. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:26 am
First, the ECtHR considered that bodies of the executive vested with State powers are essentially different from legal entities, including public or State-owned corporations, engaged in competitive activities in the marketplace as the latter rely on their good reputation to attract customers with a view to making a profit and the former exist to serve the public and are funded [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:36 am
Reznik v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court opinion, issued this morning, reverses the earlier state court opinion in Preston v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
John Fund v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:38 pm
I listened with interest to the arguments in Vest v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:22 pm
The trial judge entered judgment in favor of the employee in the amount of almost $850,000, stating that the employer granted the stock options for goals already achieved by the employee (even though the options had not vested).Analysis: The Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
Similarly, Georgia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Ryan v. [read post]
