Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Recently, in Taylor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:38 am
Sonja Keating, Senior VP and General Counsel of the United States Equestrian Federation, and attorney Joe Terry reported on the many interesting legal issues that arose during the 2010 World Equestrian Games, held for the first time in the United States last year at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 2:07 pm
Despite the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States on June 26, 2015, the effects of longstanding discrimination against the gay and lesbian community continue to linger at both the state and federal level. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:38 am
United States, a criminal sentencing case that adopts a... [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
*In February 2012, Green County (County) and Green County CSEA Unit 7000, Local 820 [CSEA], executed a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called "Taylor Law. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
*In February 2012, Green County (County) and Green County CSEA Unit 7000, Local 820 [CSEA], executed a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called "Taylor Law. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
T he ECHR has also recognised that art 8 protects against nuisances, such as noise pollution and toxic fumes (López Ostra v Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277 (ECHR) at [44]–[58]; Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 (ECHR); Moreno Gómez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 (ECHR); and Arrondelle v United Kingdom (1982) 26 DR 5.) [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Bunn v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
