Search for: "U. S. v. Price"
Results 541 - 560
of 797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Mota, et al., 2015 IL App (1st) 140102-U. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Mota, et al., 2015 IL App (1st) 140102-U. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
They conclude that this will not be a "V" or even a "U" shaped recession, but more like an "L" tilted slightly to the left at the top, with a long slow slog off the bottom. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In a 1999 case (Dean v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Internet and Social Media Germany’s competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt, has placed restrictions on Facebook’s data-processing activities. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
” Hill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm
Concepcion, 563 U. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Pascarella, 2011 NY Slip Op 51965(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County Nov. 2, 2011). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
News items from the security site Krebsonsecurity report that credit and debit card accounts stolen in the recent Target data breach have been flooding underground black card markets, selling in batches of one million cards, and going for asking prices of between $20 to more than $100 per card. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:55 am
” Judge Leon then laid out the government’s theory of market harm from a merger: that when Time Warner negotiates with rivals of AT&T’s MVPDs (DirecTV, DirecTVNow and AT&T U-Verse), it would have anti-competitive leverage over the rivals allowing it to either charge supra-competitive rates or to withhold the programming from the rivals entirely. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:25 am
Dorris Silk Corp (DSC) copied these patterns and undercut Cheney's prices. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
