Search for: "U. S. v. Test"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:54 pm
Until then, the bottom of the economic “U” may feel like an eternity. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
In the dissent’s view, the Supreme Court foreclosed debate when it summarized in DeShaney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Louisiana, 406 U. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am
S. 97, 102 (1976) (incorporating into the majority the Eighth Amendment "evolving standards of decency" test first announced in Trop v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:05 am
S. 218, 234–235 (2001); Skidmore v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
He would have decided that Teague test was not satisfied. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Sebelius, 567 U. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:18 am
Las citadas reducciones, deberán estar determinadas en la notificación de iniciación del procedimiento y su efectividad estará condicionada al desistimiento o renuncia de cualquier acción o recurso en vía administrativa contra la sanción». [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
We’ll be utilizing our robust testing capacity for the governors. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Kansas, 589 U. [read post]