Search for: "U.S. v. Daniels (david)" Results 541 - 560 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The guidelines say candidates can accept cryptocurrency donations if they immediately convert the digital currency into U.S. dollars. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
” Court Outlines Perils of Self-Collection and Inadequate Keyword Searches – http://bit.ly/P5S7lL (Paul Saso) U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The judgment was entered against Household International; its former Chairman and CEO William Aldinger; its former CFO and COO David Schoenholz; and its former Vice-Chair of Consumer Lending Gary Gilmer. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]