Search for: "United States Western District Court" Results 541 - 560 of 3,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 23 September 2021 Case number: No. 21-160 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 23 September 2021 Case number: No. 21-160 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by CAFE
District Court Western District of Texas, order, 10/6/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by CAFE
District Court Western District of Texas, order, 10/6/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by CAFE
District Court Western District of Texas, order, 10/6/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by CAFE
District Court Western District of Texas, order, 10/6/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:18 pm by Ralf Michaels
Using the example of the recent lawsuit of the environmental organization Milieudefensie and other environmental associations against Royal Dutch Shell before the District Court of The Hague, which was successful in the first instance, and the lawsuit of the Peruvian farmer Lliuya against RWE AG, which has been pending in the second instance at the Higher Regional Court of Hamm since 2017, Álvarez-Armas at [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The district court therefore properly awarded ownership of the letter to the Commonwealth. [read post]
When that happens, federal courts will often wait to let a state court weigh in or defer to their decisions on a question. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome: Apple Inc. petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas to vacate its order transferring this case from the Austin Division of the Western District of Texas to the Waco Division and to stay that order pending disposition of the petition. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
In September 2020, Plaintiff Brazos filed five related patent infringement actions in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas against Defendant OnePlus, a Chinese company. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 8:28 am by Steven Cohen
Bard, Inc. et al – United States District CourtWestern District of Missouri – September 22, 2021) involves a claim of medical malpractice against a doctor who implanted a filter into the plaintiff who was going to have bariatric surgery. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am by Jessica A. Huse
” The Western District of Kentucky Gives a Fresh Look to the Standard Supporting ESI Search Sufficiency Challenges appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am by Jessica A. Huse
” The Western District of Kentucky Gives a Fresh Look to the Standard Supporting ESI Search Sufficiency Challenges appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am by Jessica A. Huse
” The Western District of Kentucky Gives a Fresh Look to the Standard Supporting ESI Search Sufficiency Challenges appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 8:34 am by Logan Murr
’s petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Alan Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (WD of TX) to transfer six actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding that denying the motion to transfer constituted a legal error. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 8:34 am by Logan Murr
’s petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Alan Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (WD of TX) to transfer six actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding that denying the motion to transfer constituted a legal error. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Confirming that the district court misapprehended the evidence, Gregory, Chief Judge, stated: From that premise, it believed the AIR program could not expose the “privacies of life. [read post]