Search for: "United States v. Brennan" Results 541 - 560 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am by Geoffrey Stone
The eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
ACLU taps legal talent to defend alleged terroristshttp://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation/story/484043.html BY CAROL ROSENBERG crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com function PopupPic(sPicURLx, sHeight, sWidth) { var sPicURL = "/news/nation/v-morephotos/story/484043.html"; y=Math.floor((screen.availHeight-sHeight)/2); x=Math.floor((screen.width-sWidth)/2);… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Stephen Wermiel
Brennan believed the words represented the requirement of an extremely high wall of separation between church and state. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But the Court could avoid saying anything about the Constitution by ruling that the statute forbids race-based affirmative action.Here's the key language of Title VI: "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be . . . subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The result is that informal government threats and sanctions can create what Justice Brennan, in Bantam Books v. [read post]