Search for: "United States v. Daniels" Results 541 - 560 of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
That question was considered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York last year. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
That question was considered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York last year. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am by Melanie Fontes
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Evan Lee
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
When one’s trademark is used in an artistic or expressive way by another, courts have narrowly interpreted the Lanham Act (the primary federal statute governing trademark law in the United States) to avoid suppressing protected speech under the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:48 am
 Keane, David Brown, Jay Cohen and Daniel Toal. [1] On May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court, in a long-awaited decision, held that employment arbitration agreements with class action waivers requiring individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), notwithstanding Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), which protects employees’ rights to engage in concerted… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
“The United States,” an NBC report notes,” is currently the only country in the world that sentences juveniles to life without the possibility of parole. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]