Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 541 - 560 of 1,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 5:41 am by Russ Bensing
   Last week’s decision by the 8th District in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“BDI”) appeals from a finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York holding BDI’s asserteddesign patent invalid on summary judgment and alsodismissing BDI’s trade dress claims with prejudice. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
The Lord Advocate submits that vodka is of particular relevance in its sale in Scotland versus England and Wales, at the rate below the fifty pence rate. 1510: The Lord Advocate addresses the Court that Scotland has a per capita consumption of alcohol which is higher than England and Wales and alcohol mortality rates for men in Scotland were double than those in England and Wales, with a similar pattern for women. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm by Josh Blackman
In 2016, South Carolina reelected Republican Tim Scott to the United States Senate; Scott is the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
  This is not to suggest that the current cultural revolution in the United states (in particular) or in the liberal democratic camp (on general) ought to be faulted. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
From Gladstone to Thatcher: The Shortage of Parliamentary Time in the United Kingdom and the Implications for Tax Legislation – and BeyondJohn H N Pearce (Formerly HMRC; Associate of the Institute of Taxation, UK)5. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The mother is a citizen of the United Kingdom and the father is a citizen of the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
“Hayuk’s work has been featured widely in popular online and print publications, such as The New York Times (United States), Huffington Post (United States), Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine (United States), Hypebeast (Hong Kong), Arrestedmotion (United States), Laughing Squid (United States), Web Urbanist (United States), NYLON Magazine (United States),… [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Times had a piece “American Could Face Prison in Thailand After Posting Negative Reviews of a Resort”. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Courts of many jurisdictions have been grappling with the issue of how to regulate illegality on the internet in circumstances where most of the major corporations are based in the United States where they have immunity from liability under under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. [read post]