Search for: "United States v. Grant, III" Results 541 - 560 of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm by pkmiles@mqblaw.com
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
But in the Article III courts, Bowles v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:47 am by Philip Miles
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 141(c) (“A party to an interpartes review or a post-grant review who is dissatisfiedwith the final written decision of the Patent Trial andAppeal Board . . . may appeal the Board’s decision . . . tothe United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
Obama (Kiyemba I) that “the due process clause does not apply to aliens without property or presence in the sovereign territory of the United States” does not apply to him because he was brought to Guantanamo Bay involuntarily. [read post]