Search for: "United States v. Haire"
Results 541 - 560
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
But this is splitting hairs. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm
But this is splitting hairs. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm
The lifting of the ban places the United States with roughly a dozen other countries that allow women to serve as part of combat units, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Norway. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The parties need to recognize the mutual value of cooperation; the Court cannot define it for every family unit. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
The employee refused, and asked if he could wear a beard net (similar to a hair net). [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:53 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
United States Dist. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
Green uses the example of the decriminalization of sodomy in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
EDISON, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
It’s a far cry from Hines v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:04 am
He agreed and stipulated to the factual basis for his guilty plea and agreed that if the case were to proceed to trial, the United States could prove the agreed-to facts beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
