Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 541 - 560 of 864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts gave the traditional toast ("To the President of the United States"). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit — have interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:36 am by Dennis Crouch
”    The purpose of the 2011 amendment was to abrogate the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Holmes Group v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]