Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 541 - 560 of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
G & K appealed, and a panel of judges on the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently revisited the term “humiliation” in the context of the Auto-Owners policy. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:04 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 4:59 am by Patricia Salkin
On appeal, Sheetz contended reversal was required because the TIM fee is invalid under both the Mitigation Fee Act and the takings clause of the United States constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:08 pm by CAPTAIN
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:THE ITSY BITSY TEENY WEENY BIKINI .........Judge Fred Biery, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, has become something of a rock star these past few years.Back in 2008, ATL (Above The Law) bestowed their coveted Judge of the Day Award. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling arbitration because plaintiffs failed to establish a change in controlling law. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Dennis Crouch
" In his patent digest, Robert Matthews concludes that: Generally, a validity determination by a foreign patent office has little relevance or weight in considering the validity of a corresponding United States patent. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Susan C. Morse
§ 1503,  which was limited with a pending-proceeding requirement in United States v. [read post]