Search for: "United States v. Small"
Results 541 - 560
of 7,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Ed. 666, 676-77 (1872); see also Note, The Establishment Clause and Religion in Child Custody Disputes, 82 Mich.L.Rev. 1702, 1716 n. 49 (1984) (collecting other United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
[6] See Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm
In Midwest Ozone Group v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm
The United States Copyright Claims Board (CCB), an administrative tribunal that has been established for the purposes of resolving small copyright claims, began accepting case filings on June 16, 2022. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Or should they not be reported until the accrued dividends are actually paid out (which may, in the case of restricted stock units, occur after the vesting date)? [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In Carrier v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
But according to a variety of AI technology companies, the practice of using copyrighted materials to train an artificial intelligence platform constitutes fair use under United States copyright law. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:44 am
In one of the more publicized cases, Merck & Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:07 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm
United States felt like a legislation class in law school, with various canons of statutory construction being bandied about. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm
Dominguez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
