Search for: "United States v. State of Mich."
Results 541 - 560
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
At the very least, any legislative effort is premature, pending a study to measure the possible effects of the Iqbal and Twombly decisions that is being conducted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:48 am
Mich. 2008). [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
See also Mich. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Home Prods., 82 S.W.3d 849, 857 (Ky. 2002) (“We are supported in rejecting prospective medical monitoring claims (in the absence of present injury) by both the United States Supreme Court and a persuasive cadre of authors from academia. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
United States Postal Serv., 789 F.2d 1, 6-7 (D.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm
What makes this case especially interesting is that the employer had previously lost such a case in Kansas earlier in 2011 and had settled a similar case with the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
United States, 985 F.2d 1574, 1582 (Fed. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
June 1); In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31, 40 (Mich. 2000); Mahan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
June 1); In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31, 40 (Mich. 2000); Mahan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
United States, 754 F. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Mich. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
