Search for: "United States v. Wells"
Results 541 - 560
of 31,732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
M.A. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
But more countries could have active water markets and in the western United States, those water markets don’t work very well. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
” (See Brownell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987). [14] United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
State, 346 Ga. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
We will address the applicable Cost Principles (FAR 31.202 and FAR 31.203) as well as the overlapping provisions of the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) (CAS 402 and CAS 418), which include closely related but significantly more detailed (burdensome) requirements for CAS-covered contractors. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
The president is not an “officer of the United States” as that term is used in the Constitution....2. ... [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm
FDA found that marijuana continued to have a high potential for abuse, lacked accepted safety for use under medical supervision and had no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:29 pm
(NA) Earlier today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
