Search for: "VINCENT v. US "
Results 541 - 560
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:48 am
Quinones: In 2002, Antonio Quinones bought Prescriptions & Travel, a “pharmacy that filled prescriptions for an Internet pharmacy known as RX Networks”, which was owned by Vincent Chhabra. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:47 am
In a 6-0 decision, late last week March 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thomas Vincent v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
They pitted small v. small employers, large v. large, municipal, gov’t., etc. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:41 am
Vincent and John R. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
Vincent of Vincent & Vincent, Riverton, Wyoming. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
Interesting case being argued this morning before the Supremes, Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 3:34 pm
Solicitor General Elena Kagan encouraged the court to listen to the case of Staub v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
Specifically, in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm
See Shager v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:31 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:18 am
The split decision in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:58 am
Today, in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Staub v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Scots Law Student treated us to a traditional Burns Supper on Robbie Burns Day. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Scots Law Student treated us to a traditional Burns Supper on Robbie Burns Day. [read post]
