Search for: "Vest v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
The Constitution provides that “[a]ll legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States,” U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
" Like with the UK, the general rule is that the rights in an invention belong to the inventor (Gayler v Wilder (1851));Solomons v US (1890)). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
LITTLE V. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:09 pm
In one, United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
A snippet:"Water is a resource for which '[o]wnership . . . is vested [collectively] in the state’s residents.' . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
The ruling is consistent the holdings in Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady, decided together and reported in 252 A.D.2d 82, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 93 N.Y.2d 999. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm
In Howsam v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
Under the terms of the order, all of the assets of SIB, wherever situated, were vested in the Antiguan Liquidators. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Enter Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
The Court of Appeals addressed the impact of Section 13-173.1 in Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804, decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:55 am
In Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
Facts: This case (Lough v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 5:50 am
Facts: This case (Lough v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:52 am
Cicairos v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The court explained that New York State has a strong public policy favoring arbitration of public sector labor disputes and, citing NYC Transit Authority v Transport Workers Union, 99 NY2d 1, observed that "judicial intervention on public policy grounds constitutes a narrow exception to the otherwise broad power of parties to agree to arbitrate all of the disputes arising out of their juridical relationships. [read post]
