Search for: "Vote v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 9,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
The government submits that the United States has a significant interest in the question presented because the DOL enforces the SOX provision and the SEC has an interest in protecting whistleblowers. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm
United States (2019). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:58 pm
Bas v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
They become part of international law, and in the United States, treaties have the same force as federal law. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In June, Sierra Leone’s incumbent president was re-elected, winning just enough votes to avoid a runoff, but election observers were alarmed by statistical inconsistencies in the announced results. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
With each country having one vote, achieving consensus among more than 140 countries proves daunting. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
With each country having one vote, achieving consensus among more than 140 countries proves daunting. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:04 am
He agreed and stipulated to the factual basis for his guilty plea and agreed that if the case were to proceed to trial, the United States could prove the agreed-to facts beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
