Search for: "WARD v. STATE" Results 541 - 560 of 1,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm by Unknown
White tape and Indian wards: Removing the federal bureaucracy to empower tribal economies and self-government. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm by Barry Barnett
Has the United States Supreme Court backed away from its landmark toughening of the test for pleading a claim in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
Lethal injection is the only method of execution authorized in the state of Georgia. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:02 pm by Lawrence Solan
In 1991, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia University Hospitals v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:05 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
It supported this conclusion by stating that the Probate Act, which did allow a guardian to represent the ward in legal proceedings, limited this ability to matters related only to the estate, rather than the ward’s person. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:54 am by Karen Gullo
Related Issues: PatentsPatent Busting ProjectPatent TrollsRelated Cases: EFF v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:54 am by Karen Gullo
Related Issues: PatentsPatent Busting ProjectPatent TrollsRelated Cases: EFF v. [read post]