Search for: "WEST v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
* * *“Meet the scientist who’s been counting California butterflies for 47 years and has no plans to stop,” by Deborah Netburn for the Los Angeles Times (November 12, 2019). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:33 pm
As we previously wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Although Supreme Court automobile exception jurisprudence has evolved considerably since its Prohibition-era inception, one case stands out above all others: California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
City of Key West In Buehrle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
City of Key West In Buehrle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
City of Key West In Buehrle v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 4:09 pm
NigeriaOgwuche v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:42 am
The new law, which goes into effect on January 1, 2020, codified and expands the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:58 am
AB 5 did two things: First, it codified the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
For example, in West v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Also, the trial court did not err in indicating to Castillo that she would have to pay money to the defendant to reimburse defense counsel for expenses incurred in attending a California evidence deposition of plaintiff’s expert taken days before the scheduled trial. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Initially, the NBAM covers eight states: California, Utah, Minnesota, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maine. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Umpire Joe West has sued retired player Paul LoDuca for defamation. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:39 am
AB 5: Independent Contractors AB 5 codifies California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
