Search for: "Washington v. Government of District of Columbia"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 3:42 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which upheld the SEC’s use of its in-house courts to air claims against people accused of violating securities laws. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
A federal district court in Washington dismissed the lawsuits for lack of standing and for failure to state a clear antitrust violation. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm
That statute declares, "Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought . . . in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on the question of joint and several liable for civil forfeiture. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that in a brief filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia on Monday, the “U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:52 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
” In Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority).Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
District of Columbia, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:50 am
Then I summoned the Second Amendment, specifically the District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:23 am
Two previous iterations of financial control boards, imposed on the District of Columbia, lasted for 6 years. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
(Colon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Law §§ 13–301 to 13–501 (2013), and the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
With the fifth justice, it would no longer be futile.We can expect that the new Court will promptly overrule Citizens United, and with it the argument that the government cannot ban political pamphlets.The Second Amendment, as currently interpreted in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
District Judge Tan Ikram will give a written judgement on the case on 2 June 2016. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Legislation is being considered in 27 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
