Search for: "White v. Marshall"
Results 541 - 560
of 867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
Compare ante ("history will be heard"), with Brewer v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Common sense distinguishes the two.I am not defending Kavanaugh's ultimate conclusion in the case but this approach to statutory interpretation is consistent with Blackstone, Marshall, and common sense. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
” The reason cited is his opinion he wrote in the 1987 case of McCleskey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am
Susan V. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
Was Marshall also duped by neo-confederate ideology? [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
When he was away, my mother, who was white, used to sleep near the bayonet that he left at home. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), and Grutter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Johnson, invalidating a prosecution for flag burning was:Majority: Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, KennedyDissent: Rehnquist, White, Stevens, O'Connor And by now, just about everybody accepts Texas v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
While his approach to judging was broadly consistent with the approach of liberal stalwarts William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, it was equally in accord with the approach of many of the Court’s more moderate and conservative recent members, including John Harlan, Potter Stewart, Lewis Powell, and—in large measure—Byron White. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
" Maybe Moreno will be nominated if the five others promise to overrule Roe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gerald Gunther had been working for decades on the volume on the Marshall Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
The dissent was composed of the liberals on the Court: Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) was a per curiam opinion with all nine justices writing either concurrences (Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall) or dissents (Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist) — and the case effectively halted capital punishment in this country for a significant period of time. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) was a per curiam opinion with all nine justices writing either concurrences (Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall) or dissents (Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist) --- and the case effectively halted capital punishment in this country for a significant period of time. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am
But, then, James Boyd White (correctly?) [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Next in the competition track was Pharma & Competition, moderated by Professor Daryl Lim (John Marshall). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
