Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The claimant successfully established that the harm suffered as a result of the defendant’s expression is sufficiently serious that the public interest in permitting this defamation proceeding to continue outweighs the public interest in protecting the defendant’s expression. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
EIR 2004, reg 12(5)(e) (confidential information): The Cabinet Office v IC EA/2010/0027. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
” Patents * William Hubbard, Razing the Patent Bar. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Golinsky v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:58 am
Williams, 366 N.C. 110, 110-11 (2012) (vehicle stopped for window-tinting violation; defendant-passenger subsequently arrested after sixty-five pounds of marijuana were found in the vehicle); State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm
” Clay v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
” Pequignot v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Coble, as well as my student Sara Williams—so arguing, and urging the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case (Rasawehr v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
They trace this clear statement rule primarily to a 1992 Supreme Court case—Franklin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
The first, Nelson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
During her oversight of the BPI v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
Lumley v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:29 am
Although the defendant in State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Then-Chief Justice William H. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
Hanna 2017 BCSC 1739 Funt J found that the defendants were jointly liable for defamatory publications on the internet. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am
” Since then, other commentators have also defended an “office-related” definition of the term (see, e.g., here, here, and here).Blackstone does not support such a narrow reading. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:37 pm
The defendant alleges the officer assured her he was not a police officer, would never set her up, and he just wanted the drugs to help his sister. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
