Search for: "E v. G"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 5,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Today, Antonin Scalia often jumps in first, signalling the intentions of the Court’s ascendant conservative wing, and sometimes Chief Justice John G. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Today, Antonin Scalia often jumps in first, signalling the intentions of the Court’s ascendant conservative wing, and sometimes Chief Justice John G. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on June 1, 2008:
Sorted by Chapter Law Number. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am
(e) It is the purpose of this title to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am
The appellants' arguments can be summarized as follows:[...]V. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
See Ex. 2, Depo. of G. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
One judge, Harry E. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Amanda Hollis-BruskyTaking Back the Constitution is an ambitious book that covers a wide swath of territory in its attempt to explain, critique and offer alternatives to the contemporary Supreme Court and its constitutional agenda. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; e-mail vamodeo@cpsc.gov; telephone 301-504-7570.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:I. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
G. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
(b) If the offense for which extradition is requested constitutes a purely military offense which is not an offense under ordinary criminal law; (c) If the person whose surrender is sought has, under the laws of either the Requesting or the Requested Party, become immune by reason of lapse of time from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which extradition is requested; (d) If the person whose surrender is sought has been tried and acquitted or punished with final and binding effect in… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
John’s Wort can reduce the concentration of medications in the blood; Vitamin E can increase anti-clotting activity and cause increased risk of bleeding when taken with blood-thinning medication; Ginseng can enhance the bleeding effects of aspirin and ibuprofen; and Ginkgo Biloba can decrease the effectiveness of anticonvulsant therapy. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 10:39 am
N.O 01 860-2009-PHC/TC, fs. 28)El Tribunal Constitucional ha advertido: “En el Derecho Internacional se acepta que la obligación de extraditar en algunos casos no es de cumplimiento obligatorio e ineludible, pues su cumplimiento se encuentra sujeto a límites derivados de la protección de los derechos humanos. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:23 pm
[5]ARTICULO IXLas obligaciones de naturaleza privada por contratos u otro que pudieran ligar la persona cuya extradición se ha pedido, no impedirán en ningún caso que ésta tenga lugar, y los derechos que cualquiera pueda tener, respecto al acusado, quedan intactos siempre que los haga valer ante la autoridad judicial competente.ARTICULO XLa extradición se concederá en virtud de la demanda hecha por uno de los dos gobiernos al otro por… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
On July 30, 2024, on a party line 3-2 vote of its Board of Directors, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking[1] (the “Proposal” or the “Proposed Rule”) to substantially broaden the scope of deposits that insured depository institutions (“IDIs”) would be required to classify as brokered,[2] specifically by expanding the scope of the definition of “deposit broker” and narrowing the… [read post]
