Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 2:13 pm
Article 42.12 section 21(b) entitles every probationer in Texas in jail and awaiting there day in court the right to have a hearing on the matter no later than 20 days. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:45 am
The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts“ (IPRax) features the following articles: Erik Jayme † T. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Unsurprisingly, neither of these worked.The court’s treatment of Coral Ridge as a public figure and this dispute as involving a matter of serious public interest structured its Lanham Act analysis. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:15 am
B. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:55 am
-Paige B. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
While the figures on disadvantage might not be conclusive, that didn’t matter, as the policy was clearly not designed with the ‘least intrusive measure’ in mind. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
University of Calgary ("Pridgen") stating: "[t]he fourth tweet, as we have labelled it, is therefore saved under sub-section 2(b) of the Charter as an exercise of the Respondent's freedom of expression. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:15 am
A claim is obvious if: “the differences be- tween the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:28 am
Circuit ruled, tackling thorny procedural matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:58 pm
b. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
Evans, Moses B. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:18 am
You might be able to get a D&B or S&P report on the company in question, but in an emerging economy, it probably doesn’t reflect the set of books that you care most about. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 7 of auxiliary request II was obvious in particular in view of the combination of A3 and A9.X. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:39 pm
B. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
” Didn’t specify much of anything for senders or recipients of notices b/c the DMCA already gives plenty of detail about what you’re supposed to do. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
The complaint’s core argument is basically that “persons” doesn’t mean what one might expect it means, because (a) unlike lawfully present aliens, “illegal aliens” are “not members of the political community constituted by the Constitution,” and (b) in 1789 and/or 1868, when they said “persons,” they actually didn’t mean to include illegal aliens. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm
Impact of the ECJ “Monsanto” decision on Patent PracticeBy: Jan B. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 7:30 am
Maybe they shouldn’t be. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
I don't think there is any suggestion that (b) is present with respect to the cockfighting ban. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:29 am
The strategy notes that "[b]arriers to cross-border access to copyright-protected content services and their portability are still common, particularly for audiovisual programmes. [read post]
