Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 10,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
By Rich McHugh As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
United States, by Kristin A. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, applying strict scrutiny, upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policies. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
The Solicitor General wrote the court to inform it that the previous brief had been submitted on behalf of the United States, and that no agency-specific briefs would be forthcoming. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Just a few short weeks ago, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
Ball State University, 133 S. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 2:30 pm
” United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
On July 9, 2014, in Dilts v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:05 am
The recent Ontario Superior Court case of Hogan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
(The order refers to the brief of the United States as having been filed merely by “the FTC and the antitrust division,” while characterizing the short submissions by individual ministries of foreign governments as broadly setting forth the views of “the Republic of Korea” and “Taiwan. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 2:41 pm
In short, the act allowed any citizen to claim an island on behalf of the United States, as long as that island was uninhabited and covered in bird poop. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
A short time later, the union distributed the disparaging memo to county employees. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stewart v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
” This focus on the fairness and reliability of class action management methods raises parallels to the United States Supreme Court’s Daubert opinion’s focus on the relevance and reliability of expert testimony. [read post]
