Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 16,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
.'" Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
So held the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its January 10, 2018 decision in Taha v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
ADDED: "[V]ariations on the phrase have been used by politicians and states — including New Jersey, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia — to describe their own pro-business policies for at least two decades. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
He will file an amicus brief on behalf of the State and Local Legal Center supporting the respondents in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:41 am
" In Richardson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:36 am
Shammas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am
The Second Circuit, for instance, held that Rule 9(b) requires fraud complaints to allege facts that lead to a “strong inference” that the defendant has the requisite state of mind even though Rule 9(b) provides that conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally, see, e.g., IKB International v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:13 am
In 1992, the Supreme Court in Burson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 7:36 am
" Drop Stop LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Overall, this is a harmful trend characterized by excessive State responses. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 10:41 am
The overbreadth doctrine is “strong medicine,” and has a tendency, as Justice Antonin Scalia noted in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
This creates a strong bias in favor of disclosing, said Buckholz. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm
For Canada, in particular, strengthening legal protection for Internet platforms could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The first fact pattern was that of the Kidane v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
The decision was premised on a strong affirmation of the right to acquire property. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
As established in the Court of Justice of the European Union’s 2014 Google Spain case, this is a right under data protection law for individuals to request that search engines de-list specified results appearing in response to a search for the individual’s name.[1] While search engines may decline to de-list results based on public interest considerations, the RTBF is still far broader than de-listing or removal rights in many countries, including the United States. [read post]
