Search for: "T-7 Inc" Results 5581 - 5600 of 8,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations omitted], lv dismissed… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Aggregate Industries Northeast Region Inc., (1st Cir. 2/7/12), the First Circuit overturned a summary judgment granted into favor of an employer against a employee who had been a qui tam relator in a False Claims Act suit against a concrete supplier to the “Big Dig” in Boston. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
I am confident that I would be violating the principle audi alteram partem by rejecting that evidence.The next case is General Electric Canada (January 7, 2007, Bendel). [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:07 am by PaulKostro
Gentilini Ford, Inc., 181 N.J. 245, 280-81 (2004), Rule 4:42-9(a) provides that “[n]o fee for legal services shall be allowed” except in enumerated circumstances, one of which is in a family action. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:05 am by Steve Hall
Attorneys had been battling for days over the issue.The high court, in a terse one-page order issued after 7 p.m. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:27 pm by WIMS
Access a release from API and link to the task force documents (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:25 am by Mark Theodore
International, Inc., 365 NLRB No. 67 (May 5, 2017)  a two person NLRB majority rejected the General Counsel’s attempt to gain summary judgment in a handbook case. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent act of 1793 required “[t]hat every inventor, before he can receive a patent, shall swear or affirm that he does verily believe, that he is the true inventor or discoverer. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am by gmlevine
Forum June 7, 2001) – but it is “unusual” for the Panel to make the respondent’s case. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:17 am by Patricia Salkin
We would also like to thank our generous Institute sponsors: Castagna Realty Co., Inc. [read post]