Search for: "The Examiner" Results 5581 - 5600 of 162,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2008, 3:42 am
In addition, "the presence of corroborating evidence diminishes the potential value of cross-examination at the expulsion hearing. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Additionally, the clarity of patent applications and the amount of time USPTO allots examiners to complete their work, among other challenges, may affect examiners’ ability to ensure that patents USPTO issues are high quality. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:15 pm by Bill Stalter
  While the Staff Recommendations cite Section 436.420 as authority for requiring the copying of contracts, Section 436.470 is the authority for examinations, and that language requires the seller to provide the examiner access to all preneed books and records. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Dennis Crouch
However, for this Special Needs Examiner, logic just doesn't cut it. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 1:32 am
Applicants should avoid flooding the examiner with cumulative prior art references. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:12 am by Matt Osenga
  When the application comes up for examination, the examiner will conduct a prior art search and submit to the applicant a Pre-Interview Communication identifying rejections or objections. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Ally Kvidt
Over time, the bar examination process has become more standardized, but there’s no one test. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:13 am by Vincent LoTempio
I'm not sure if this data suggests that: applications filed with prioritized examination requests are strong applications or Are patent applications having prioritized examination getting favorable treatment? [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:10 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
According to the report, Director Cordray announced the change on a conference call with CFPB examiners. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 1:30 pm
According to Helena Spongenberg writing for EUOBSERVER/FOCUS on October 25, 2006, patent examiners at the Munich-based European Patent Office (EPO) held a "staff rally" strike on Wednesday (25 October) due to quality v. quantity concerns over the implementation of a new system in 2007 to assess the work of the examiners. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Division of Examinations announced a focus on climate-related risks as part its 2021 examination priorities. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:07 am
For more about cross-examining experts, see also these related posts: "Preparing for Expert Depositions by Looking Ahead to the Cross-Examination at Trial" and "Cross-Examining Experts During Depositions: A Tip. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by The Docket Navigator
How Examiner Would have Applied ItThe court denied plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's inequitable conduct defense based on the alleged failure to disclose an IEEE article comparing plaintiff's product to a preexisting product embodying the patented invention. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
General Motors strikes out: In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:15 am by Jon Hyman
McDonald claimed that the second examination violated the ADA’s requirement of one post-offer, pre-employment examination. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:12 am by Rose Hughes
The case was therefore remitted directly back to the Examining Division. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:28 pm
  Cross-examination in court was therefore impossible. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:03 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The Federal Register document provides an alternative for certain employers to remotely examine Form I-9 documents, instead of the current requirement to examine documents in-person. [read post]