Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 5601 - 5620 of 13,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 2:44 pm by Kevin
§§ 29-2-125 and 29-6-303(A)(4) (it’s also legal in Oklahoma). [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
§ 213(a)(3) provides an exemption from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements for: Any employee employed by an establishment which is an amusement or recreational establishment, organized camp, or religious or non-profit educational conference center, if (A) it does not operate for more than seven months in any calendar year, or (B) during the preceding calendar year, its average receipts for any six months of such year were not more than 33 1/3 per centum of… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:22 am by Jeff Nowak
29 CFR 825.121(a)(1) Is the Employee Entitled to 12 Weeks for Foster Care Placement and Another 12 weeks Should They Adopt the Child? [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
A scanned copy of the RTI application and the response received from NCRB is at Annexure -1. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:53 am
S 1063 First Act: 01/16/07 referred to governmental employeesLast Act: 05/29/07 substituted by s106305/29/07 returned to senate LAW / CRIM-PROCA2407 Sweeney (MS) -- Authorizes defendants to make electronic appearances in pending criminal actions in the county of Suffolk Same as S 3536 Chapter Signed Date Effective Date29  05/14/2007 provided that the amendment to subd 1 of §182.20 of… [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:48 am by Mayela Celis
As this judgment only deals with Contracting Parties to the 1996 Child Protection Convention, it only makes us wonder what would happen in the case of bilateral treaties or in the absence of any applicable treaty (but see para. 29 of the judgment). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:49 pm
Const. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 12:20 pm by Jill Collins
Action Item: Consider whether your private leave benefit plan might qualify for an exemption and, if it does, apply for the exemption as soon as April 29, 2019. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
”[29] It is about as damning a dismissal of academic arguments as one encounters. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 1, April 14, April 22, April 29, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 2, June 9 and June 16 conferences; record requested and received after the April 22 conference) Grzegorczyk v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
The FLSA defines “employee” as “any individual employed by an employer,” 29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1), and “employer” as including “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee,” 29 U.S.C. 203(d). [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by Giles Peaker
The grounds of challenge were: 1.That both the residence qualification and the residence uplift discriminate indirectly and unlawfully under ss.19 and 29 of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA”) against persons with the protected characteristic of “race” and that, as Irish Travellers, the Claimants have such a characteristic. 2. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
" Idaho presented the following questions: 1. [read post]