Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 5601 - 5620 of 30,602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
But all we got this morning was a unanimous decision in Lomax v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
”  There is substantial authority to the effect that “bribery” is a generic designation and does not limit predicate acts to state laws that are specifically labeled as bribery. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Gray and others v G-T-P Group Ltd: Re F2G Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] EWHC 1772 (Ch) held that a charge characterised as a floating charge over financial collateral will only qualify as a floating charge under the Regulations if “legal control” as opposed to “administrative control” of the underlying financial collateral is transferred to the collateral-taker. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
On May 21st a Federal Court justice delivered a decision in the case Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
"You're an asshole" understates the appropriate critique. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:11 am by @wiselaw
In the face of this crisis, we have embraced drastic changes to how we live, work, shop and even interact with one another.Consider the actions that have been necessary in the employment law context.With businesses across the province forced to shut down with little to no notice, many employers have had to make the difficult decision to lay off or downsize their workforce to stay financially afloat.While in the normal course, such actions would be governed by the Employment Standards Act (ESA)… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Written by María Barral Martínez, a former trainee at the European Court of Justice (Chambers of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona) and an alumna of the University of Amsterdam and the University of Santiago de Compostela The Hoge Raad Neederlanden (The Dutch Supreme Court), the referring court in the case Supreme Site Service and Others, C-186/19, harbours doubts regarding the international jurisdiction of Dutch courts under the Brussels I bis Regulation, in respect to a request to… [read post]