Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 7,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
A petition for “multi-district litigation” status was filed not long after publication, and the lawsuit industry is jockeying for the inside post in controlling the litigation. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
Philipp, in the Supreme Court,[10] and Simon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
Consequences include damages for the breach and the voiding of contract or other remedies flowing from the law of contracts.[24] Breaches of a collective agreement, however, only generate the right to file a grievance to an arbitrator.[25] In McGavin, even the fundamental breach of not showing up to work was held inadequate to prompt common law remedies, although the employer did have the right to file a grievance and seek termination at the arbitration hearing.[26] In Falconbridge likewise… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Tapan Banerjee AIR 1986 P&H 113, Ram Sarup v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Anti-Libel Injunctions and Criminal Contempt As compensatory damages have become practically unavailable to more and more libel victims, courts have shifted to a remedy that had long been seen as categorically forbidden — injunctions against libel.[3] And this trend seems to have accelerated as the Internet has democratized access to the media. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
A few weeks later, on February 25, a trial judge in Manhattan ruled in Beth R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
There's a long answer and a short answer. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
As McPherson was the sole recipient of the messages and they did not cause any long-lasting adverse effects to the claimant, the Judge decided that the serious harm threshold was not met. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 8:13 pm
A recent example of why such self-prepared agreements are problematic was illustrated in a recent case, Scully v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
(Yamagiwa v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
(Yamagiwa v. [read post]
