Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 10,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm
The Pueblo (and also the Alabama-Coushatta), by contrast, argue that the reference to “prohibited” activities is a short-hand reference to the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:11 am
All the way up to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
United States and Cox v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
I should also mention a short-lived, tenth challenge: In February, a Democratic primary candidate filed a one-sentence Section 3 challenge to Rep. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
United States, 268 U.S. 563, 566 (1925). [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada stated, 91 The contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from the ordinary commercial contract. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Federal judges appointing Officers of the United States? [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
In short, the defendant cannot have it both ways. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:55 am
This article is the first entry in a symposium previewing Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am
But that doesn't have to prevent the parties from engaging in constructive dialog, or multilateral talks that would also involve the United States and the United Kingdom.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
This issue is often raised in college towns (see this table), and our Supreme Court has issued a ruling on it (Dvorak v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm
In United States ex rel Allan Myers VA, Inc. v. [read post]
