Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 5601 - 5620 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
© has a clear enforcement asymmetry b/c rights owners have a clear mechanism of enforcing rights, but there’s no mechanism for public rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Doomed to failure b/c very project of identifying a hypothetical aesthetic object is riven w/strongly inconsistent perspectives. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  B/c we live in a democratic society, not b/c we have preferences for news. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
State Apple Advertising Comm’n, associational standing exists “when: (a) the association’s members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of individual members in the lawsuit. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American medical centers has a notable mortality rate.[57] Among survivors, at least five percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[58] But “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:55 am by Jan von Hein
(C) Concerning the rectification and removal of a publication, AG Bobek states that those claims are indivisible by nature because of the unitary nature of the source. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:52 pm by Liisa Speaker
When a change of custody affects a child’s established custodial environment, the proponent of the change bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the change is warranted under the best-interest factors in MCL 722.23.The trial court concluded that plaintiff proved by clear and convincing evidence that the change of custody was in the child’s best interests after finding that factors (b), (c), (d), (e), (h), and arguably (l)… [read post]