Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5601 - 5620 of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
A recent case that comes to mind is Holder v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
 Before management of the rights of reproduction and communication to the public can be taken into consideration, the holder of those exclusive rights must have authorised a management organisation to manage his rights. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
However, in the NCS Multistage Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
  And in both, the credit card holder later sued for problems with the collection efforts. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
Holder (No. 08-495); the case was argued in April, and a decision is expected by the end of June. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Title V also excludes persons who received shares pursuant to employee compensatory plans in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act from counting against the number of holders of record. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm by Leland E. Beck
Holder: In National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]