Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 36,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
The test of Helvering v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:27 am
The Court’s six-to-two ruling in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:12 am
Adler) This morning the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
Virgin Islands who was a plaintiff in a similar lawsuit, Segovia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
In that case, Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
Correction officers may be sued by prisoners seeking money damages for alleged violations of 42 USC §1983 rights in state supreme courtHaywood v Drown et al, Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York, USSC No. 07-10374.Decided May 26, 2009New York's Correction Law §24 provides that New York State's trial courts of general jurisdiction cannot entertain §1983 suits filed by prison inmates seeking money damages from… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm
[The plaintiffs in Juliana v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There has been previous comment here on the various stages of Banks v Cadwalladr, and the facts have been well-stated. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:22 pm
Irving Trust Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 11:01 am
The stay, if granted, would be in effect until the Court acts on the state's pending appeal (Gale v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:07 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:52 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:07 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:52 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:52 am
Today the high court announced that it will hear American Electric Power v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
We know from the state post-conviction court that the State’s “proof of guilt [at that trial] was not a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination. [read post]