Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 10,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
The relationship between EU law and the municipal law of the United Kingdom seems to lend itself to allusions to water. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm
An applicant or his or her counsel should submit the electronic equivalent of soft copies taken from one of the United States Patent & Trademark Office’s (USPTO) automatic systems. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
The United States attorney representing the Post Office, S. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Five Justices in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
By Rich McHugh As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
JEW filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, requesting the court to declare that the above mark does not infringe or dilute any of the DUKE trademarks owned by Duke University. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States came as quite a surprise. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
• The stated purpose of the corporation in the charter is “to continue the operation of an Episcopal Diocese under the Constitution and Canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Recalling that Israeli espionage against the United States had not profoundly disrupted the Israeli-American relationship, Wittes urged the Germans to “finally grow up. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
When the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision Riley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
