Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 5621 - 5640 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  (FDA’s determination of its jurisdiction to issue the ban was challenged and upheld in State of La. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
Fry had been convicted of first degree murder. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
UNITED STATES (No. 08-728) United States Supreme Court Opinion Decided: March 8, 2010 The Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm by dennis l. hall
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides:In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm by dennis l. hall
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides:In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
  This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
More than 14,000 individuals, predominantly women, are brought into the United States annually and exploited for their labor, including those in the commercial sex industry. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:21 am by James Bickford
In 1993, Diapolis Smith was convicted of second-degree murder in Kent County, Michigan. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1382 (Fed. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm by Law Lady
Weekly D339bCriminal law -- First degree murder -- Kidnapping -- Burglary of dwelling -- Aggravated stalking -- Argument -- Claim that prosecutor impermissibly shifted to defendant the burden of proving essential element of crime by misstating that if jury believed beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was not dead, they should acquit defendant was not preserved for review by contemporaneous objection, and misstatement did not constitute fundamental error -- Misstatement occurred only… [read post]