Search for: "GUESS v. GUESS"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 8,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
As you might have guessed, the case I have in mind is not a hypothetical. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
EEOC v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
As you might have guessed, the case I have in mind is not a hypothetical. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:44 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Our best guess is that there is only one, Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
I guess a corollary is to never share your email account with anyone. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
, Powell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 4:12 am
In general, as seen in the Appellate Division, First Department’s Simon v Moskowitz decision, where the operating agreement gives the managers full discretion whether, when, and how much to distribute, the courts will not second guess management’s business judgment. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Since an appellate court will not ordinarily second-guess a Board’s resolution of factual and credibility issues, the fact finder’s decision on most misconduct allegations will not be disturbed on appeal [see Matter of Hartman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
The Defendant, Muzmatch, was launched in 2011 and, you guessed it, offers online dating for Muslims.Match Group owned UK and EUTMs for MATCH.COM (the earliest filed in 1996) and a figurative MATCH mark, but no word mark for MATCH. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:56 am
I believe it had to do with service in a combat zone and not for a particular act of heroism.But Crow's Bronze Star has the "V" device for combat valor or heroism during the battle. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
By Eric Goldman Due to the intervention of Public Citizen, Rosetta Stone filed an unredacted brief in its appeal of Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:32 am
In particular, in the Stanford v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:55 am
See Hutchens v. [read post]
