Search for: "High v State"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am
In a 2019 survey conducted by the CDC, 39% of high school students emailed or texted while driving in the last month. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Ct. 2419, 2427 (2015). [3] Oil States Energy Servs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
The Court of Appeal considered that the acts by Russia upon which Ukraine relies for the purposes of the Duress Defence were acts of high policy (per Lord Neuberger’s ‘third rule’ in Belhaj v Straw [2017] UKSC 3). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
Jul. 16, 2008), the Ninth Circuit held that CAFA's "general grant of the right of removal of high-dollar class actions does not trump" section 22(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. section 77v(a)), which contains a "specific bar to removal of cases [filed in state court and] arising under the ... [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
The High Court in their first instance decision had found, following Jacobs v MIB [2010] EWCA Civ 1208, that compensation under the 2003 Regulations fell to be determined by reference to the law of the claimant’s state of residence. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:19 am
Hoffer – Employment & Labor David V. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:07 pm
In Dishmon et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:48 am
"Summarily" means the error was so obvious that the high court could reverse on the state's petition alone, without setting the case for full briefing and argument.The rule in the federal courts and every state is that a criminal defendant who can make a claim on his initial appeal on the trial record must do so or lose it. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Casias v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument this morning in a high-profile case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:03 am
Next fall, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in County of Maui v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:55 am
”Subsequently the High Court reaffirmed that patronage dismissals may contravene the First Amendment in Branti v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:03 pm
” Tim Ryan of Courthouse News Service reports that “High Court Weighs Extent of State Sovereignty. [read post]
