Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 5,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Ass’n of Pol. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Supp. 502 (D. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
This year, “migrant crime” has become a cornerstone of Trump’s campaign. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In the 2012 decision in Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:42 pm
Do you have a real-life SuperHuman Lawyer or Legal Professional that you’d like us to mention? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Progressive N. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
If you’re listening to this show and you’d like to attend that or you know of someone that would like to attend, the best thing that you can do is actually email the law firm at info, that’s I‑N‑F‑O @medinalawgroup.com and make a reference in the subject line that you’d like to be invited and we will coordinate that with you to get you invited. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
If you’re listening to this show and you’d like to attend that or you know of someone that would like to attend, the best thing that you can do is actually email the law firm at info, that’s I‑N‑F‑O @medinalawgroup.com and make a reference in the subject line that you’d like to be invited and we will coordinate that with you to get you invited. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will… [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
On July 26, 2024, Eastern District of New York Judge Eric N. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
D’Anjou, 16 F.3d 604, 608 (4th Cir. 1994) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
In litigating scientific issues, lawyers and judges will necessarily have to engage with substantive matters. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
We concluded `that, given the employee’s consent to his employer’s monitoring of both computers, the employee had no reasonable expectation of privacy when he used the home computer for personal matters. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
Today’s order was, in my view, largely a foregone conclusion. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
” Id. at 905 n.13. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
” See 134 S. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
The trial court agreed that there had to be some evidence about “what happened to other employees,” and said the focus of the exclusion was only on “prohibit[ing] other employees . . . from coming in and saying, ‘I was RIF’d, it was because of my age and that sort of thing. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
