Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 5621 - 5640 of 42,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Claimant appealed but the Appellate Division sustained the Board's ruling finding that its decision was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:44 pm
In short, the rules set out above that encourage the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
When a judge rules against you during your Illinois divorce, that ruling may or may not be significant enough to bring that ruling before an appeals court for review. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
  He began his ruling by noting that under Rule 29, a must enter a judgment of acquittal`of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Subsequently the Appellate Division dismissed the student’s appeal of the Supreme Court’s ruling, stating that:It is well settled that in reviewing a college’s or university's disciplinary determinations, "court[s] must determine 'whether the university substantially adhered to its own published rules and guidelines for disciplinary proceedings," citing Matter of Warner v Elmira Coll., 59 AD3d 909.The court explained that only in the… [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:08 am by Will Newman
An example may be relying on one piece of evidence when claiming there is “a mountain of evidence” in support of a claim. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In the latter, the court left open the possibility that statistically insignificant evidence could be immaterial as a matter of law but left it to the jury to determine the significance of the data. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
If the movant has proven there is an arbitration agreement as a matter of law, the trial court must compel arbitration. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:20 pm
 The matter has received a lot of attention recently, and is often presented as a case where an innocent man was executed. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:29 am
”  Instead, discovery would be permissible of “any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:16 am by Elizabeth A. Khalil
And even where the CFPB’s rule addresses matters covered by state law, those state laws will be preempted only to the extent of any inconsistency with the rule. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:40 am by Nassiri Law
The court determined 7-Eleven sending the checks was not evidence that the company determined the dollar figure on the checks or who received them. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:12 pm by Lauren Bateman
Davis responds that he doesn’t anticipate that the defense would challenge all pieces of evidence twice; the process thus would be streamlined, in that the commission could spend less time considering each piece of evidence seriatim and more time focusing on the substance of the matter. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm by MBettman
 At issue in this case is whether or not an affidavit which incorrectly claimed that the Defendant stated he used a computer to facilitate a crime was sufficient to establish probable cause for a warrant to search his computer, and if not, whether the exclusionary rule should apply to  exclude evidence of child pornography found as a result of the search. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
Sources: In the Matter of Obra Capital Management IA Rel 6662 [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:09 am by V.D.RAO
As a matter of fact, the rules of procedure to be followed by this Court as a Company Court are regulated by The Companies (Courts) Rules 1959. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But any comparative claim regarding a market leader will look bad on these factors no matter how obviously nonconfusing the use is. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:18 am by Sandy T. Fox
In a recent Florida opinion, the appellate court discussed whether a judgment by default in a custody matter was proper, ultimately ruling that it was not. [read post]