Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
I interpret this result as a sign the judge simply doesn’t believe consumers were harmed by the competitive keyword advertising because there was no real actual confusion. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The Court affirmed that the Fair Housing Act prohibits not only explicit racial discrimination, but also policies and practices that have the effect of excluding or harming racial minorities. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:02 pm
Publicly Released: Jul 8, 2015: “The Medicaid program marks its 50th anniversary on July 30, 2015. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
The court says: * Mark strength. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
As compared to partisan state legislators, the voters of a state may focus more on what is right and fair nationally, and also on what is in the selfish attention-generating interest of that state—and less on the real or perceived harm done to (even their preferred) political party. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:57 pm
You know that fun, old chestnut “there’s no harm in asking. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 12:14 am
The allegation is the landowner and a general contractor assisting with the project diverted water through grading that could cause actual and potential harm to the flow of ground water in Shasta County. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:15 am
Unfortunately, parties often don’t find this out until after they’ve been harmed by another third-party’s infringement. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:46 am
A framework then, was articulated by the court… In considering and balancing the parents’ right to discipline their children while also safeguarding a child from abuse and endangerment, the SJC held that a parent may not be criminally liable for the use of force against a minor child under his/her care and supervision, provided that: the force used against the minor child is reasonable; the force is reasonably related to the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:46 am
A framework then, was articulated by the court… In considering and balancing the parents’ right to discipline their children while also safeguarding a child from abuse and endangerment, the SJC held that a parent may not be criminally liable for the use of force against a minor child under his/her care and supervision, provided that: the force used against the minor child is reasonable; the force is reasonably related to the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the decision of a lower court of appeals and reinstated the first-degree murder conviction and 70-year sentence of Mark Downs, who shot and killed a 6-year-old boy, Nico Contreras, in his sleep. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
But also makes clearer what the functions of a TM are and you may avoid overprotection/protect only when there’s a real likelihood of harm. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:01 am
If you were harmed by the negligence of another St. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Asking psychologists how to test some of our assumptions about marks—e.g, beginning of words mattering most; consumers focus on most distinctive part of mark and ignore generic/descriptive elements. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
These include marks that are purely descriptive in their startup; shapes; marks in limited supply such as colors. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:52 am
The court found irreparable harm because of the significant risk of damage to Arborjet’s reputation and relationships with its consumers. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
My gay and lesbian friends have no illusions that Obergefell marks the end of what one with whom I partied at a gay pride event in Brooklyn last night called their “liberation struggle. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
Since the agency's caseloads are already considered by some to be too high, the fear was the expanded mission could harm capital representation. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:07 pm
Dorvil, concluding that there was indeed a common-law right to spank: [A] parent or guardian may not be subjected to criminal liability for the use of force against a minor child under the care and supervision of the parent or guardian, provided that (1) the force used against the minor child is reasonable; (2) the force is reasonably related to the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the minor, including the prevention or punishment of the minor’s misconduct; and (3) the force… [read post]
